-Construct and solve a decision problem by calculating an intervention’s expected value across competing strategies in a decision tree
-Determine the decision threshold across a range of scenarios
-Differentiate between joint and conditional probabilities and demonstrate their use in decision trees
You have been appointed as Director of a funding allocation committee responsible for prevention & treatment initiatives for HIV.
How will the committee decide on the proportion of funds for prevention efforts versus treatment?
Should any of the funds be used for research?
How do you respond to a member who argues that the funds are better spent on childhood vaccinations?
A hypothetical birth defect is present in every 1 in 1,000 children born
Unless treated, this condition has a 50% fatality rate
Should we test for this hypothetical birth defect?
A hypothetical birth defect is present in every 1 in 1,000 children born.
Unless treated, this condition has a 50% fatality rate.
Should we test for this hypothetical birth defect?
Diagnostic test: Perfectly accurate
All newborns in whom the defect is identified can be successfully cured
BUT the test itself can be lethal:
Objective: Minimize total expected deaths
Objective: Minimize total expected deaths
Consider a population of 100,000 newborns
Testing produces: (0.0004 x 100,000) = 40 expected deaths
No testing produces: (0.001 x 0.5 x 100,000) = 50 expected deaths
Objective: Minimize total expected deaths
Consider a population of 100,000 newborns
Testing produces: (0.0004 x 100,000) = 40 expected deaths
No testing produces: (0.001 x 0.5 x 100,000) = 50 expected deaths
Objective: Minimize total expected deaths
Consider a population of 100,000 newborns
Testing produces: (0.0004 x 100,000) = 40 expected deaths
No testing produces: (0.001 x 0.5 x 100,000) = 50 expected deaths
With testing, virtually all 40 deaths occur in infants born without the fatal condition.
With no testing, all 50 expected deaths occur from “natural causes” (i.e. unpreventable birth defect)
“Innocent deaths” inflicted on children who had “nothing to gain” from testing program
We may treat one child’s death as more tolerable than some other’s – even when we have no way, before the fact, of distinguishing one infant from the other.
Aims to inform choice under uncertainty using an explicit, quantitative approach
Aims to identify, measure, & value the consequences of decisions + uncertainty when a decision needs to be made, most appropriately over time.
Probability of rain = 30%
Scenario | Payoff |
---|---|
At beach, no rain | 1.0 |
At beach, rain | 0.4 |
At home, no rain | 0.8 |
At home, rain | 0.6 |
\(\color{green}{0.82} = \underbrace{\color{red}{0.3} \cdot \color{blue}{0.4}}_{\text{Rain}} + \underbrace{\color{red}{0.7} \cdot \color{blue}{1.0}}_{\text{No Rain}}\)
\(\color{green}{0.74} = \underbrace{\color{red}{0.3} \cdot \color{blue}{0.6}}_{\text{Rain}} + \underbrace{\color{red}{0.7} \cdot \color{blue}{0.8}}_{\text{No Rain}}\)
EV(Beach)=0.82 > EV(Home)=0.74
Write the equation for each choice using a variable, p, for the probability in question
Set the equations equal to to one other and solve for p.
Beach: 0.82 = 0.3 x 0.4 + 0.7 x 1.0
Home: 0.74 = 0.3 x 0.6 + 0.7 x 0.8
\(\underbrace{0.3 * 0.4 + 0.7 * 1.0}_{\text{Beach}} = \underbrace{0.3 * 0.6 + 0.7 * 0.8}_{\text{Home}}\)
Replace probabilities with P and 1-P and solve for “P”
p * 0.4 + (1-p) * 1.0 = p * 0.6 + (1-p) * 0.8
\(\underbrace{0.3 * 0.4 + 0.7 * 1.0}_{\text{Beach}} = \underbrace{0.3 * 0.6 + 0.7 * 0.8}_{\text{Home}}\)
p * 0.4 + (1-p) * 1.0 = p * 0.6 + (1-p) * 0.8
p * 0.4 + (1-p) * 1.0 = p * 0.6 + (1-p) * 0.8
0.4p + 1-p = 0.6p + 0.8 - 0.8p
1-0.6p = 0.8 - 0.2p
1-0.8 = 0.6p - 0.2p
0.2 = 0.4 * p
0.5 = p
When the probability of rain is 50% at BOTH the beach and home, given how we weighted the outcomes, going to the beach would be the same as staying at home
In other words, you would be indifferent between the two – staying at home or going to the beach
Earlier, we solved for the expected payoff of remaining at home: 0.74
What would \(p_B\) need to be to yield an expected payoff at the beach of 0.74?
Set 0.74 (expected value of remaining at home) equal to the beach payoffs and solve for \(p_B\)
pB * 0.4 + (1 - pB) * 1.0 = 0.74
pB * 0.4 + (1 - pB) * 1.0 = 0.74
pB * 0.4 + 1 - p~B = 0.74
pB * 0.4 + 1 - p~B = 0.74
pB * -0.6 = -0.26
pB * -0.6 = -0.26
pB = -0.26 / -0.6 = 0.43
When the probability of rain at the beach is 43% (probability of rain at home remains at 30%), we would be indifferent between staying at home & going to the beach.
If the probability of rain at the beach in > 43%, then we would stay home
The likelihood of an event taking place in the future.
Joint probability
P(A and B): The probability of two events occurring at the same time.
Conditional probability
P(A|B): The probability of an event A given that an event B is known to have occurred.
Maximizing expected value is a reasonable criterion for choice given uncertain prospects; though it does not necessarily promise the best results for any one individual.
Maximizing expected value is a reasonable criterion for choice given uncertain prospects; though it does not necessarily promise the best results for any one individual.
Mini-max regret
Maxi-max
Expected utility
Maximizing expected value is a reasonable criterion for choice given uncertain prospects; though it does not necessarily promise the best results for any one individual.
Mini-max regret
Maxi-max
Expected utility
Maximizing expected value is a reasonable criterion for choice given uncertain prospects; though it does not necessarily promise the best results for any one individual.
Maximizing expected value is a reasonable criterion for choice given uncertain prospects; though it does not necessarily promise the best results for any one individual.
Treatment A:
Treatment B:
Source: (Caro et al. 2015)